Commentary Peer Reflection
"High school students should not have any homework"
1. Katie M.
2. Their story is about homework in high school.
3. Their direct opinion is that students in high school do not need homework.
4. Yes, they addressed the other side, homework can be beneficial to some students, but not in extreme amounts.
5. They weren't wishy-washy, they had facts to back up some of their claims, like using a survey.
6. There were no quotes.
7. They wrote in first person.
"Snapchat has turned into an unsafe environment for users under the age of 18"
1. Katie M.
2. Their story is about Snapchat and it's safety for users.
3. Their direct opinion is that Snapchat has turned into an unsafe environment for minors, and that users have been taking advantage of the app and using it inappropriately to make racist video and send inappropriate pictures.
4. No, they didn't really address the other side, they just focused on the negative parts of Snapchat and it's features.
5. They weren't wishy-washy, they included some facts and quotes to back up their claims well.
6. There were quotes from: The chief parenting officer of digital safety Titania Jordan, celebrity attorney Mark Geragos, and Huffington Post employee Mary Papenfuss.
7. They wrote in third person.
8. This piece is an editorial because it fit all of the criteria for an editorial. It rejected the other side, had a thesis statement, and had many facts.
1. Katie M.
2. Their story is about homework in high school.
3. Their direct opinion is that students in high school do not need homework.
4. Yes, they addressed the other side, homework can be beneficial to some students, but not in extreme amounts.
5. They weren't wishy-washy, they had facts to back up some of their claims, like using a survey.
6. There were no quotes.
7. They wrote in first person.
"Snapchat has turned into an unsafe environment for users under the age of 18"
1. Katie M.
2. Their story is about Snapchat and it's safety for users.
3. Their direct opinion is that Snapchat has turned into an unsafe environment for minors, and that users have been taking advantage of the app and using it inappropriately to make racist video and send inappropriate pictures.
4. No, they didn't really address the other side, they just focused on the negative parts of Snapchat and it's features.
5. They weren't wishy-washy, they included some facts and quotes to back up their claims well.
6. There were quotes from: The chief parenting officer of digital safety Titania Jordan, celebrity attorney Mark Geragos, and Huffington Post employee Mary Papenfuss.
7. They wrote in third person.
8. This piece is an editorial because it fit all of the criteria for an editorial. It rejected the other side, had a thesis statement, and had many facts.
Comments
Post a Comment